Poole v. State

79 So. 3d 886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Poole v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3918
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 2012·No. 5D11-2896, 5D11-2897, 5D11-2898, 5D11-3247, 5D11-3249, 5D11-3274, 5D11-3278, 5D11-3302, 5D11-3315, 5D11-3316, 5D11-3317, 5D11-3318, 5D11-3319, 5D11-3320, 5D11-3321, 5D11-3322·Published

Opinion

79 So.3d 886 (2012)

Synthia POOLE, et al., Appellants,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 5D11-2896, 5D11-2897, 5D11-2898, 5D11-3247, 5D11-3249, 5D11-3274, 5D11-3278, 5D11-3302, 5D11-3315, 5D11-3316, 5D11-3317, 5D11-3318, 5D11-3319, 5D11-3320, 5D11-3321, 5D11-3322.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

February 14, 2012.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

MONACO, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poole v. State, 79 So. 3d 886 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

79 So. 3d 886 (Poole v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)