Poole v. State
79 So. 3d 886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Poole v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3918 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 2012·No. 5D11-2896, 5D11-2897, 5D11-2898, 5D11-3247, 5D11-3249, 5D11-3274, 5D11-3278, 5D11-3302, 5D11-3315, 5D11-3316, 5D11-3317, 5D11-3318, 5D11-3319, 5D11-3320, 5D11-3321, 5D11-3322·Published
Opinion
Synthia POOLE, et al., Appellants,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
MONACO, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poole v. State, 79 So. 3d 886 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
79 So. 3d 886 (Poole v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flagg v. State
74 So. 3d 138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)