Poole v. Powell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Poole v. Powell

92 S.E. 949, 20 Ga. App. 256, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 851

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1917

Docket8253

StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E. 949 (Poole v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poole v. Powell, 92 S.E. 949, 20 Ga. App. 256, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 851 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The exceptions to excerpts from the charge of the court to not require a reversal of the judgment in this case. The charge of the court, as matter of law, was abstractly correct, and if thfe defendant [257]*257wished a more specific charge, it was incumbent on him to request it in writing.

Decided June 15, 1917.

Action on contract; from Fulton superior court—Judge Fibs. January 27, 1916.

James L. Key, for plaintiff in error. Walter A. Sims, contra.

2. The court did not err in overruling the defendant’s demurrer.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there is no assignment of error that requires a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, 0. J., and George, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI