Poole v. Higgins

1914 OK 492, 143 P. 666, 143 P. 606, 44 Okla. 96, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 645
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 13, 1914·No. 3482·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

SPIARP, C.

This case presents error from the district court of Carter county. Since the filing of the petition in error in this court it has come to the knowledge of the court, and it is admitted by counsel, that the parties have fully settled their differences, and that therefore the controversy between them has been determined. This being true, the court will not consider the questions of 'law involved, but will dismiss the appeal at the cost of the plaintiffs in error. Price et al v. Board of Commissioners, 8 Okla. 121, 56 Pac. 959; Smith v. Boatman, 29 Okla. 818, 120 Pac. 599.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poole v. Higgins, 1914 OK 492, 143 P. 666, 143 P. 606, 44 Okla. 96, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 645 (Okla. 1914).

1914 OK 492 (Poole v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'n
49 P.2d 488 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1935)