Poole v. Gonzalez
This text of 782 So. 2d 777 (Poole v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the summary judgments in favor of the defendants. The record does not contain substantial evidence that the alleged medical negligence was the proximate cause of the death of the patient whose administratrix has filed this action. Smith v. Medical Ctr. East, 585 So.2d 1325 (Ala.1991); Sasser v. Connery, 565 So.2d 50 (Ala.1990); and Peden v. Ashmore, 554 So.2d 1010 (Ala.1989). See also Ex parte Wiginton, 743 So.2d 1071 (Ala.1999); Morrison v. Franklin, 655 So.2d 964 (Ala. 1995); Marvin’s, Inc. v. Robertson, 608 So.2d 391 (Ala.1992); Boykin v. Magnolia Bay, Inc., 570 So.2d 639 (Ala.1990); Smith v. Equifax Servs., Inc., 537 So.2d 463 (Ala. 1988).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
782 So. 2d 777, 2000 Ala. LEXIS 469, 2000 WL 1651056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-gonzalez-ala-2000.