Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Poole v. Franklin Cty.

Poole v. Franklin Cty.

743 N.E.2d 399, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1458, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 629
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 2001
Docket01-158
StatusPublished

This text of 743 N.E.2d 399 (Poole v. Franklin Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poole v. Franklin Cty., 743 N.E.2d 399, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1458, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 629 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss by Dr. Jack Wagner. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
743 N.E.2d 399, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1458, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-franklin-cty-ohio-2001.