Poole v. Florida
303 U.S. 619, 58 S. Ct. 611
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U. S. 445, 448, 449; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; Susquehanna Co. v. Tax Commission (No. 2) 283 U. S. 297, 299, 300; Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina, 291 U. S. 652. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Poole v. Florida, 303 U.S. 619, 58 S. Ct. 611 (1938).
303 U.S. 619 (Poole v. Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.
255 U.S. 445 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Hebert v. Louisiana
272 U.S. 312 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Susquehanna Power Co. v. State Tax Commission
283 U.S. 297 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina
291 U.S. 652 (Supreme Court, 1934)