Poole v. Florida

Supreme Court

Poole v. Florida

303 U.S. 619, 58 S. Ct. 611

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 14, 1938

DocketNo. 748

StatusPublished

This text of 303 U.S. 619 (Poole v. Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poole v. Florida, 303 U.S. 619, 58 S. Ct. 611 (1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U. S. 445, 448, 449; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; Susquehanna Co. v. Tax Commission (No. 2) 283 U. S. 297, 299, 300; Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina, 291 U. S. 652. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U. S. 445, 448, 449; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316, 317; Susquehanna Co. v. Tax Commission (No. 2) 283 U. S. 297, 299, 300; Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. South Carolina, 291 U. S. 652. The motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 U.S. 619, 58 S. Ct. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-florida-scotus-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack