Poole v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

45 Va. Cir. 355, 1998 Va. Cir. LEXIS 89
CourtRichmond County Circuit Court
DecidedApril 14, 1998
DocketCase No. LC-2780-3
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Va. Cir. 355 (Poole v. CSX Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Richmond County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poole v. CSX Transportation, Inc., 45 Va. Cir. 355, 1998 Va. Cir. LEXIS 89 (Va. Super. Ct. 1998).

Opinion

BY JUDGE RANDALL G. JOHNSON

I have checked the statute which prescribes venue in FELA cases. Contrary to plaintiffs assertion, 45 U.S.C § 56 does allow venue where the cause of action arises, so venue is proper in Greensville County. I have, however, also reconsidered plaintiffs argument concerning defendants’ representations about whether any witnesses would be substantially inconvenienced by having to come to Richmond to testify and I now agree that a sufficient showing of substantial inconvenience was not made.

Defendants were unable to state that any witness reasonably likely to testify at trial lives or works so far from Richmond as to make Richmond a substantially inconvenient forum. For example, the trooper who responded to the accident scene probably worked that territory in January, 1996, but counsel were unable to say where he lives or what territory he covers now. I believe that a stronger showing must be made before the court can hold that keeping the case here will be substantially inconvenient. Accordingly, defendants’ motions to transfer venue will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 56
45 U.S.C. § 56

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Va. Cir. 355, 1998 Va. Cir. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-csx-transportation-inc-vaccrichmondcty-1998.