Poole v. Copland, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Poole v. Copland, Inc.

487 S.E.2d 552, 346 N.C. 282

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 5, 1997

DocketNo. 145PA97

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 487 S.E.2d 552 (Poole v. Copland, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poole v. Copland, Inc., 487 S.E.2d 552, 346 N.C. 282 (N.C. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of plaintiffs petition for discretionary review and defendant’s (Copland, Inc.) petition for discretionary review, the following order is entered: The petitions are allowed 5 June 1997 for the limited purpose of addressing the issues raised in the petitions as to the applicability of the “thin skull” rule and the instruction given by the trial court. All other issues requested for review are denied 5 June 1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of plaintiffs petition for discretionary review and defendant’s (Copland, Inc.) petition for discretionary review, the following order is entered: The petitions are allowed 5 June 1997 for the limited purpose of addressing the issues raised in the petitions as to the applicability of the “thin skull” rule and the instruction given by the trial court. All other issues requested for review are denied 5 June 1997.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 S.E.2d 552, 346 N.C. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-copland-inc-nc-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack