Poole v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
181 A.D.2d 1073, 583 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4735
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 13, 1992
StatusPublished
This text of 181 A.D.2d 1073 (Poole v. Consolidated Rail Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Poole v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 181 A.D.2d 1073, 583 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed without costs (see, Eschberger v Consolidated Rail Corp., 181 AD2d 1073 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mintz, J. — Prejudgment Interest.) Present — Den-man, P. J., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eschberger v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
181 A.D.2d 1073 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 A.D.2d 1073, 583 N.Y.S.2d 168, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poole-v-consolidated-rail-corp-nyappdiv-1992.