Poole v. Carteret County Sheriff's Department

458 F. App'x 232
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 15, 2011·No. Nos. 11-6744, 11-7314·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Edward E. Poole appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous and denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Poole failed to state a claim that the Defendants violated his constitutional rights. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Poole v. Carteret Cnty. Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 5:10-ct-03215-BO (E.D.N.C. May 10, 2011; July 15, 2011). We also deny Poole’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poole v. Carteret County Sheriff's Department, 458 F. App'x 232 (4th Cir. 2011).

458 F. App'x 232 (Poole v. Carteret County Sheriff's Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.