Pool v. Shuffield
This text of 214 S.W.2d 223 (Pool v. Shuffield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant prosecutes this appeal from a judgment against him in a suit brought by appellee, a minor, to recover a truck which appellee had traded to appellant.
An examination of appellant’s abstract and brief discloses that the judgment appealed from must be affirmed for noncompliance with rule 9 of this court. In the abstract prepared and filed by appellant the motion for new trial is not shown nor are its contents abstracted. There is, therefore, nothing in the abstract to apprise us of what matters were presented to the lower court in the motion for new trial.
Accordingly, under our rules, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 S.W.2d 223, 213 Ark. 975, 1948 Ark. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pool-v-shuffield-ark-1948.