Pool v. Huff

Supreme Court of Georgia

Pool v. Huff

20 Ga. 671

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 15, 1856

DocketNo. 128

StatusPublished

This text of 20 Ga. 671 (Pool v. Huff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pool v. Huff, 20 Ga. 671 (Ga. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

Ought the Court to have granted the motion for a new trial ? We think so.

•There was not a particle of evidence against Pool, the defendant. What evidence there was, was all against Pool, the witness.

And as against the witness, the evidence did not make out a case of damage to the amount of as much as forty-three-dollars.

We regret to have to reverse a judgment and grant a new trial in so small a case, but we do not see how granting one is to be avoided»

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI