Pool v. Duckworth
96 S.E. 179, 148 Ga. 180, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 249
Opinion
1. The evidence authorized the verdict. 2. There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in overruling the ground of the motion for, a new trial based upon the evidence claimed to be nefwly discovered, as the evidence was merely cumulative and impeaching.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pool v. Duckworth, 96 S.E. 179, 148 Ga. 180, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 249 (Ga. 1918).
96 S.E. 179 (Pool v. Duckworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jones v. State
149 S.E.2d 426 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1966)
Gates v. State
66 S.E.2d 342 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
Yatesville Planing Mill Co. v. Johnson
129 S.E. 905 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)