Poochigian v. State

430 P.3d 531
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 16, 2018
DocketNo. 77296
StatusPublished

This text of 430 P.3d 531 (Poochigian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poochigian v. State, 430 P.3d 531 (Neb. 2018).

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The district court entered the judgment of conviction on July 17, 2018. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until October 25, 2018, well after the expiration of the 30-day jurisdictional appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). Nonetheless, appellant requests this court to entertain the appeal or order appellant's immediate release from custody. This court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an untimely appeal. Losada v. State , 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). A claim that appellant was inadequately advised of the right to appeal should be asserted in the district court in the first instance in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Id. Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lozada v. State
871 P.2d 944 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
430 P.3d 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poochigian-v-state-nev-2018.