Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ponzoli v. Hawkesworth

Ponzoli v. Hawkesworth

390 So. 2d 784, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18155
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 25, 1980
DocketNo. 80-775
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 390 So. 2d 784 (Ponzoli v. Hawkesworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ponzoli v. Hawkesworth, 390 So. 2d 784, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18155 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves the correctness of an order apportioning costs during the penden-cy of an appeal. The original appeal involved the rights of the parties incident to the dissolution of their law firm. In this connection, see opinion of this court rendered in Hawkesworth v. Ponzoli, 388 So.2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We find that the order under review in this cause had the impact of modifying the original final judgment, while the appeal in the cited cause was pending.

Therefore, we reverse the order under review and return the matter to the trial court to assess costs as provided in the original final judgment.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon v. Hollo
636 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. Lantz
440 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Scott v. State
431 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
F & R BUILDERS, INC. v. Durant
390 So. 2d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
390 So. 2d 784, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponzoli-v-hawkesworth-fladistctapp-1980.