Ponvert v. Belmont

The Superior Court of New York City

Ponvert v. Belmont

13 Jones & S. 577

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedMarch 3, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Jones & S. 577 (Ponvert v. Belmont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ponvert v. Belmont, 13 Jones & S. 577 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Van Vorst, J.,

wrote for affirmance with costs, liokii;ig substantially, as follows:—The justice of the plaintiff’s claim has been established by the general tcnu of this court in Ponvert v. Belmont (42 Super. Ct. 531). The error of the referee on the former trial has been corrected on the new trial; in other respects, the judgment is as it was before. Appellant’s exceptions to rulings of referee-do not call for interference with judgment.

Speir, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Vorst, J.,

wrote for affirmance with costs, liokii;ig substantially, as follows:—The justice of the plaintiff’s claim has been established by the general tcnu of this court in Ponvert v. Belmont (42 Super. Ct. 531). The error of the referee on the former trial has been corrected on the new trial; in other respects, the judgment is as it was before. Appellant’s exceptions to rulings of referee-do not call for interference with judgment.

Speir, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Jones & S. 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponvert-v-belmont-nysuperctnyc-1879.