Ponvert v. Belmont

The Superior Court of New York City

Ponvert v. Belmont

13 Jones & S. 577

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided March 3, 1879·Published

Opinion

Van Vorst, J.,

wrote for affirmance with costs, liokii;ig substantially, as follows:—The justice of the plaintiff’s claim has been established by the general tcnu of this court in Ponvert v. Belmont (42 Super. Ct. 531). The error of the referee on the former trial has been corrected on the new trial; in other respects, the judgment is as it was before. Appellant’s exceptions to rulings of referee-do not call for interference with judgment.

Speir, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Vorst, J.,

wrote for affirmance with costs, liokii;ig substantially, as follows:—The justice of the plaintiff’s claim has been established by the general tcnu of this court in Ponvert v. Belmont (42 Super. Ct. 531). The error of the referee on the former trial has been corrected on the new trial; in other respects, the judgment is as it was before. Appellant’s exceptions to rulings of referee-do not call for interference with judgment.

Speir, J., concurred.

Ponvert v. Belmont, 13 Jones & S. 577 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Pincite

13 Jones & S. 577 (Ponvert v. Belmont) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.