Pontos Renovation, Inc. v. Kitano Arms Corp.

670 N.E.2d 220, 88 N.Y.2d 914, 646 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1712
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 11, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 670 N.E.2d 220 (Pontos Renovation, Inc. v. Kitano Arms Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pontos Renovation, Inc. v. Kitano Arms Corp., 670 N.E.2d 220, 88 N.Y.2d 914, 646 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1712 (N.Y. 1996).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order compelling discovery and Supreme Court’s order denying plaintiff’s motion to extend the notice of pendency, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Cross motion for imposition of sanctions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 N.E.2d 220, 88 N.Y.2d 914, 646 N.Y.S.2d 980, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pontos-renovation-inc-v-kitano-arms-corp-ny-1996.