Ponton v. State

990 So. 2d 609, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12671, 2008 WL 3914880
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 2008·No. No. 3D08-1752·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Ponton has raised a facially sufficient claim for rule 3.800(a) relief that the trial court, by summarily denying the motion, has failed to conclusively refute. Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. On remand, if the trial court again enters an order denying the post-conviction motion, the trial court shall attach written portions of the record conclusively refuting the defendant’s claim. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D) (requiring reversal by this [610]*610court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ponton v. State, 990 So. 2d 609, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 12671, 2008 WL 3914880 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

990 So. 2d 609 (Ponton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cobb v. State
990 So. 2d 609 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)