Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pontius v. State

Pontius v. State

965 So. 2d 356, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15165, 2007 WL 2781142
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pontius v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 932 So. 2d 618 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 2007·No. No. 4D07-1844·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing a rule 3.800(a) motion that alleges where in the record the information regarding jail time can be located and explains how the record demonstrates entitlement to relief. See Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

GUNTHER, STONE and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pontius v. State, 965 So. 2d 356, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 15165, 2007 WL 2781142 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

965 So. 2d 356 (Pontius v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)