Ponti v. EVEANN PROPERTIES, INC.
725 N.W.2d 46
This text of 725 N.W.2d 46 (Ponti v. EVEANN PROPERTIES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ponti v. EVEANN PROPERTIES, INC., 725 N.W.2d 46 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Ernest V. PONTI and Delores D. Ponti, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
EVEANN PROPERTIES, INC., Vince Finazzo, and Janice Finazzo, Defendants/Cross Defendants-Appellees, and
Tommy Tire, Michael Mihail, and Anita Mihail, Defendants/Cross Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Ernest V. Ponti, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Corporal J. Pinnegar, Michael Mihail, Eveann Properties, Inc., Vincent Finazzo and Janice Finazzo, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Jackson
725 N.W.2d 46 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
725 N.W.2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponti-v-eveann-properties-inc-mich-2006.