Pontello v. O'Shea

200 Misc. 417, 106 N.Y.S.2d 934
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 17, 1951·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The administrator’s certificate was controlling (Cottrell v. Eross, 198 Misc. 859).

In addition, since the determination below, the State Residential Rent Law was amended so as to provide that the order of the commission granting a certificate of eviction shall be subject to judicial review only by means of an article 78 proceeding (L. 1946, ch. 274, § 9, as amd. by L. 1951, ch. 443).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlords as prayed for in petition, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pontello v. O'Shea, 200 Misc. 417, 106 N.Y.S.2d 934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

200 Misc. 417 (Pontello v. O'Shea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rental & Management Associates Corp. v. Gossin
61 Misc. 2d 305 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1969)
Kimmel v. Hughes
35 Misc. 2d 161 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)