Pontefact v. Isenberger
This text of 106 F. 499 (Pontefact v. Isenberger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause has been submitted upon an agreed s tat ('men I: of facts. It shows that the plaintiffs have the sole right to the use of the trade-mark “Golden Wedding,” as applied [500]*500to the whisky of their production, and that the defendant has refilled the plaintiffs’ barrels carrying the trade-mark, to palm off his product as that of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are, therefore, entitled to a decree according to the terms of the stipulation. Decree for plaintiffs for $350, according to stipulation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 F. 499, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pontefact-v-isenberger-circtsdny-1900.