Ponte v. Ponte
This text of 743 N.W.2d 214 (Ponte v. Ponte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pamela Ann PONTE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert Francis PONTE, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the August 30, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for plenary consideration. Because the July 12, 2007 order of the Washtenaw Circuit Court is a postjudgment order awarding attorney fees and costs, it is a final order under MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iv) that is appealable as a matter of right under MCR 7.203(A)(1).
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
743 N.W.2d 214, 480 Mich. 1032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponte-v-ponte-mich-2008.