Ponsony v. Debaillon

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Ponsony v. Debaillon

7 Mart. (N.S.) 204

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 15, 1828

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Mart. (N.S.) 204 (Ponsony v. Debaillon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ponsony v. Debaillon, 7 Mart. (N.S.) 204 (La. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The defendants pleaded the exception of litis pendencia. The court overruled it, and they appealed.

The appeal is premature, and must be dismissed. The judgment is not final; nor the grievance irreparable; for if the decision was erroneous, the error can be corrected after the cause is tried on its merits.

Garland and Simon for the plaintiff— Bowen and Brownson for the defendants.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the appeal be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter, J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The defendants pleaded the exception of litis pendencia. The court overruled it, and they appealed.

The appeal is premature, and must be dismissed. The judgment is not final; nor the grievance irreparable; for if the decision was erroneous, the error can be corrected after the cause is tried on its merits.

Garland and Simon for the plaintiff— Bowen and Brownson for the defendants.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged, and decreed, that the appeal be dismissed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Mart. (N.S.) 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponsony-v-debaillon-la-1828.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack