Ponds Homeowners Ass'n v. Ponds, Inc.

625 A.2d 1377, 226 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 177
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 26, 1993·No. SC 14783·Published

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 919 (AC 11342), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in upholding the trial court’s determination that probable cause existed that the defendant The Ponds, Inc., fraudulently transferred, without consideration, certain condominium units to the individual codefendants (and Pomeroy Properties) where the only evidence in support were Real Estate Conveyance tax forms which were rebutted by evidence of a note and mortgage?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in upholding the trial court’s determination that probable cause existed that the individual defendants breached their May 11, 1989 agreement contrary to the statements of plaintiff’s counsel that he was not pursuing defendants under the counts of the complaint pertaining to that agreement and contrary to the evidence?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ponds Homeowners Ass'n v. Ponds, Inc., 625 A.2d 1377, 226 Conn. 905, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 177 (Colo. 1993).

625 A.2d 1377 (Ponds Homeowners Ass'n v. Ponds, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ponds Homeowners Ass'n v. Ponds, Inc.
621 A.2d 327 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)