Pondexter v. Smith
115 A.D.2d 1014, 497 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55424
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1985·Published
Opinion
for reargument granted and, upon reargument, judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed (see, Matter of Semper v Smith, 66 NY2d 130). Moreover, the hearing officer’s designation was proper (Matter of Purnell v Kelly, 115 AD2d 1010), and a review [1015] of the record reflects the right of respondent to call witnesses was not denied. Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pondexter v. Smith, 115 A.D.2d 1014, 497 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).
115 A.D.2d 1014 (Pondexter v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People ex rel. Vega v. Smith
485 N.E.2d 997 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Purnell v. Kelly
115 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)