Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pondexter v. Smith

Pondexter v. Smith

115 A.D.2d 1014, 497 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55424
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 115 A.D.2d 1014 (Pondexter v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pondexter v. Smith, 115 A.D.2d 1014, 497 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55424 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

for reargument granted and, upon reargument, judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and petition dismissed (see, Matter of Semper v Smith, 66 NY2d 130). Moreover, the hearing officer’s designation was proper (Matter of Purnell v Kelly, 115 AD2d 1010), and a review [1015]*1015of the record reflects the right of respondent to call witnesses was not denied. Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Vega v. Smith
485 N.E.2d 997 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Purnell v. Kelly
115 A.D.2d 1010 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 A.D.2d 1014, 497 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pondexter-v-smith-nyappdiv-1985.