Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC, Nixon Peabody, LLP, and Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, LLP v. Illinova Generating Company N/K/A Illinova Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 17, 2015·No. 05-15-00339-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered November 17, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00339-CV

PONDERSOSA PINE ENERGY, LLC, NIXON PEABODY, LLP, AND SHANNON, GRACEY, RATLIFF & MILLER, LLP, Appellants

V.

ILLINOVA GENERATING COMPANY N/K/A ILLINOVA CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-04536

ORDER We DENY Constance M. Boland’s November 16, 2015 application for admission pro hac

vice without prejudice to filing a proper “sworn motion” as required under the Rules Governing

Admission to the Bar. See Tex. Rules Govern. Bar Adm’n R. XIX(a) (2014).

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC, Nixon Peabody, LLP, and Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, LLP v. Illinova Generating Company N/K/A Illinova Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC, Nixon Peabody, LLP, and Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, LLP v. Illinova Generating Company N/K/A Illinova Corporation (Ponderosa Pine Energy, LLC, Nixon Peabody, LLP, and Shannon, Gracey, Ratliff & Miller, LLP v. Illinova Generating Company N/K/A Illinova Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.