Ponder v. McGruder

Supreme Court of Georgia

Ponder v. McGruder

42 Ga. 242

DecidedJanuary 15, 1871

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Ga. 242 (Ponder v. McGruder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ponder v. McGruder, 42 Ga. 242 (Ga. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

Warner, J.

The motion for a continuance of the case was properly overruled, on the showing made therefor. The defendant rented the ’premises of the plaintiff, to whom the rents and profits thereof belonged, according to the evidence disclosed in the record, and the action was properly brought in his name to recover the rent due from the defendant, under his contract with the plaintiff, without describing himself as trustee.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warner, J.

The motion for a continuance of the case was properly overruled, on the showing made therefor. The defendant rented the ’premises of the plaintiff, to whom the rents and profits thereof belonged, according to the evidence disclosed in the record, and the action was properly brought in his name to recover the rent due from the defendant, under his contract with the plaintiff, without describing himself as trustee.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Ga. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponder-v-mcgruder-ga-1871.