Ponder v. Grant
This text of 85 S.E. 929 (Ponder v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The only issue in this case is one of fact, and, that having been resolved by the jury in favor of the plaintiff, their finding will not be disturbed.
2. The ground of the motion for a new trial based upon alleged newly discovered evidence is wholly without merit. The documentary evidence in question is merely cumulative in character; its subject-matter was testified to upon the trial, and, in its^ attempted introduction, the movant failed to meet the requirements of the Civil Code, § 6086.
3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 S.E. 929, 16 Ga. App. 629, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponder-v-grant-gactapp-1915.