Ponder v. Fischer

54 A.D.3d 1094, 864 N.Y.S.2d 572
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 11, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 54 A.D.3d 1094 (Ponder v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ponder v. Fischer, 54 A.D.3d 1094, 864 N.Y.S.2d 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

[1095]*1095Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of fighting, assaulting an inmate and engaging in violent conduct. Upon review, the misbehavior report, as amplified by the hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored it, provides substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Harrison v Bertone, 50 AD3d 1352, 1353 [2008]). As for petitioner’s assertion that the misbehavior report was deficient, while each of the two incident dates listed therein was apparently incorrect by one day, the report, as a whole, was sufficiently detailed such that petitioner had notice of the charges against him and was able to prepare a meaningful defense (see Matter of Vines v Goord, 19 AD3d 951, 953 [2005]; Matter of Carini v Selsky, 19 AD3d 718, 719 [2005]).

Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that the penalty imposed was excessive, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Legeros v. Annucci
147 A.D.3d 1175 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Chandler v. Annucci
135 A.D.3d 1258 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Grant v. Prack
86 A.D.3d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Combes v. Artus
62 A.D.3d 1134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Stone v. Fischer
62 A.D.3d 1064 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Brower v. D. Venettozzi
60 A.D.3d 1176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Peets v. Bezio
59 A.D.3d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Perretti v. Fischer
58 A.D.3d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.3d 1094, 864 N.Y.S.2d 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponder-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2008.