Ponder v. Been
This text of Ponder v. Been (Ponder v. Been) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
2022-NCSC-24
No. 70A21
Filed 11 March 2022
MARK W. PONDER
v.
STEPHEN R. BEEN
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, 275 N.C. App. 626, 853 S.E.2d 302 (2020), reversing an order
entered on 29 October 2019 by Judge W. Robert Bell in Superior Court, Mecklenburg
County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 15 February 2022.
Sodoma Law, by Amy Simpson, for plaintiff-appellant.
James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A., by Preston O. Odom, III, and Claire Samuels Law, PLLC, by Claire J. Samuels, for defendant-appellee.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of
Appeals is reversed.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ponder v. Been, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ponder-v-been-nc-2022.