Pondella Hall for Hire, Inc. v. Lámar
This text of 860 So. 2d 19 (Pondella Hall for Hire, Inc. v. Lámar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PONDELLA HALL FOR HIRE, INC., n/k/a Eight Hundred, Inc., Appellant,
v.
Lawson LAMAR, State Attorney, etc., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Thomas F. Egan of Thomas F. Egan, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and George Waas, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Pondella Hall for Hire, Inc. (Pondella) appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of Lawson Lamar, State Attorney on Pondella's complaint for replevin and damages.
The underlying facts and procedural aspects of this case are recited in Pondella Hall for Hire, Inc. v. City of St. Cloud, 837 *20 So.2d 510 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (Pondella I) and Pondella Hall for Hire, Inc. v. Croft, 844 So.2d 696 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (Pondella II).
We affirm the summary judgment because Pondella sought the wrong remedy in the incorrect court for return of its property or any damages it has allegedly incurred as explained in Pondella I and II.
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
860 So. 2d 19, 2003 WL 22357808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pondella-hall-for-hire-inc-v-lamar-fladistctapp-2003.