Pond v. Medway

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Pond v. Medway

1 Super. Ct. Jud. 193

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1765

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 193 (Pond v. Medway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pond v. Medway, 1 Super. Ct. Jud. 193 (Mass. 1765).

Pincite

Opinion

RULED, on Argument, unanimously by all the 5 Judges, — That, on a Certiorari, no Evidence should be admitted, but what came up in [194]*194the Case: (²) And the Council was not admitted to mention any Fact, but what appeared from the Record.

1765.

The Reason assigned by the Court was, that it would be Injustice to the Sessions to judge on Matters which from the Record returned, did not appear to have been before them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RULED, on Argument, unanimously by all the 5 Judges, — That, on a Certiorari, no Evidence should be admitted, but what came up in [194]*194the Case: (²) And the Council was not admitted to mention any Fact, but what appeared from the Record.

1765.

The Reason assigned by the Court was, that it would be Injustice to the Sessions to judge on Matters which from the Record returned, did not appear to have been before them.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Super. Ct. Jud. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pond-v-medway-mass-1765.