Pond & Hasey Co. v. Winslow

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Pond & Hasey Co. v. Winslow

106 N.W. 1133, 97 Minn. 537, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 729

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 20, 1906

DocketNos. 14,671—(56)

StatusPublished

This text of 106 N.W. 1133 (Pond & Hasey Co. v. Winslow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pond & Hasey Co. v. Winslow, 106 N.W. 1133, 97 Minn. 537, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 729 (Mich. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The principal question in this ease is whether the findings of the trial court are sustained by the evidence. The ruling excluding certain evidence offered by defendants was not error. The evidence upon the issue whether the pur[538]*538chase of the boiler, the value of which plaintiff seeks to recover, was absolute or conditional, was conflicting, presenting a question of fact for the trial court. The findings are not clearly against the evidence and must be sustained1.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The principal question in this ease is whether the findings of the trial court are sustained by the evidence. The ruling excluding certain evidence offered by defendants was not error. The evidence upon the issue whether the pur[538]*538chase of the boiler, the value of which plaintiff seeks to recover, was absolute or conditional, was conflicting, presenting a question of fact for the trial court. The findings are not clearly against the evidence and must be sustained1.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 N.W. 1133, 97 Minn. 537, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pond-hasey-co-v-winslow-minn-1906.