Ponce v. Ricupero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ponce v. Ricupero

282 A.D.2d 589, 723 N.Y.S.2d 389, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3770

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated July 13, 2000, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution was properly denied (see, Indemnity Ins. Co. v Lamendola, 261 AD2d 580; Monahan v Pressman, 237 AD2d 496). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated July 13, 2000, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution was properly denied (see, Indemnity Ins. Co. v Lamendola, 261 AD2d 580; Monahan v Pressman, 237 AD2d 496). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Ponce v. Ricupero, 282 A.D.2d 589, 723 N.Y.S.2d 389, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

282 A.D.2d 589 (Ponce v. Ricupero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related