Pomroy v. Columbian Insurance Co.

2 Cai. Cas. 260
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1804·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

This perfon comes forward, in the light of a witnefs : every man xyho does fo, puts his general character [261]*261in blue. You have invited the inquiry, by dating him NEW-YORK. a man of character and reputation. Every witnefs at a trial is equally unprepared ; we do not, therefore, fee why we may not quedion his credibility as much as if he was before a jury, Read the affidavits.

NEW-YORK. Nov. 1804.

Spencer J.

I diflent entirely from this determination. I think it may lead to very oppreffive and ferious confequences. A man’s charafter is to be dfted, not from what he appears and fays himfelf, but from what others relate of him. He may not even be prefent, when the information he gives is made ufe of, and mud, therefore, be furprifed by fuch an inquiry. I cannot agree to trying a man’s reputation in this manner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pomroy v. Columbian Insurance Co., 2 Cai. Cas. 260 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).

2 Cai. Cas. 260 (Pomroy v. Columbian Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sing Yow
78 P. 235 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Burlingame v. Cowee
12 A. 234 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1887)
Fleming v. Hollenback
7 Barb. 271 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Macy v. DeWolf
16 F. Cas. 353 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island, 1847)
Williams v. Baldwin
18 Johns. 489 (New York Supreme Court, 1821)