Pompei v. Cardinale

Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas

Pompei v. Cardinale

75 Pa. D. & C.2d 370, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 136

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

DecidedNovember 14, 1975

Docketno. 459

StatusPublished

This text of 75 Pa. D. & C.2d 370 (Pompei v. Cardinale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pompei v. Cardinale, 75 Pa. D. & C.2d 370, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 136 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

GREENBERG, J.,

This is defendants’ second petition for reconsideration in this matter.

Defendants seek to obtain certain Social Security records for the purpose of verifying plaintiff’s claimed loss of earnings. Plaintiff claims these losses as a self-employed person.

There is included in this petition reasons for the granting of the motion which had not been set forth previously and which do present a valid basis for the granting of the motion. It is unfortunate that they were not advanced in the original motion so that the additional filing and consequential delay could have been avoided. We do not in any way condone this type of procedure, but we do recognize that this is a relatively recent lawsuit and that no real detriment has been suffered by plaintiff, at least insofar as delay is concerned.

Accordingly, we enter the following

ORDER

And now, November 14, 1975, defendants’ petition for reconsideration is granted. Our order of September 29, 1975, is hereby rescinded and plaintiff shall execute Social Security authorizations for defendants to obtain his quarter-by-quarter earnings for the years 1970 to 1974 inclusive.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GREENBERG, J.,

This is defendants’ second petition for reconsideration in this matter.

Defendants seek to obtain certain Social Security records for the purpose of verifying plaintiff’s claimed loss of earnings. Plaintiff claims these losses as a self-employed person.

There is included in this petition reasons for the granting of the motion which had not been set forth previously and which do present a valid basis for the granting of the motion. It is unfortunate that they were not advanced in the original motion so that the additional filing and consequential delay could have been avoided. We do not in any way condone this type of procedure, but we do recognize that this is a relatively recent lawsuit and that no real detriment has been suffered by plaintiff, at least insofar as delay is concerned.

Accordingly, we enter the following

ORDER

And now, November 14, 1975, defendants’ petition for reconsideration is granted. Our order of September 29, 1975, is hereby rescinded and plaintiff shall execute Social Security authorizations for defendants to obtain his quarter-by-quarter earnings for the years 1970 to 1974 inclusive.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 Pa. D. & C.2d 370, 1975 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pompei-v-cardinale-pactcomplphilad-1975.