Pompano Beach v. GEN. MOBILE HOME BROKERS

493 So. 2d 97, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1939
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 1986·No. 85-2765·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

493 So.2d 97 (1986)

CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, Appellant,
v.
GENERAL MOBILE HOME BROKERS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 85-2765.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

September 10, 1986.

*98 Philip J. Montante, Jr. of Philip J. Montante, Jr., P.A., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Donald J. Freeman of Beverly & Freeman, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The City of Pompano Beach appeals from a final order granting replevin and ordering the return of appellee's property. Appellant's police department seized the property pursuant to the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act, sections 932.701-932.704, Florida Statutes. The Pompano Beach police made a routine stop of appellee's boat because no name or Florida registration numbers were displayed on it, as required by section 328.07(4), Florida Statutes. The police discovered contraband on board and seized the boat.

Appellee with knowledge of the pending forfeiture proceeding filed a separate replevin action seeking return of its property. Appellant filed a motion to dismiss the replevin action based on section 932.703(1), Florida Statutes (1983). The trial court denied appellant's motion.

We reverse on the authority of Lamar v. Universal Supply Co., 479 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1985). Section 932.703(1), Florida Statutes (1983), precludes the maintenance of a replevin action during the pendency of a forfeiture action.[1] We remand this cause for entry of an order dismissing the replevin action.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Effective October 1, 1985, section 932.703(1) was amended to allow a replevin action if forfeiture proceedings are not initiated within ninety days after the date of seizure. The amendment is not controlling because this seizure was on July 6, 1985.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pompano Beach v. GEN. MOBILE HOME BROKERS, 493 So. 2d 97, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1939 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

493 So. 2d 97 (Pompano Beach v. GEN. MOBILE HOME BROKERS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Ormond Beach v. Kosmalski
588 So. 2d 35 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
City of Coral Gables v. Rodriguez
568 So. 2d 1302 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
City of Miami v. Barclay
563 So. 2d 203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
McLane v. Youngblood
544 So. 2d 1179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)