Pomilio v. Crosson
199 A.D.2d 1052, 608 N.Y.S.2d 912
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 29, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 199 A.D.2d 1052 (Pomilio v. Crosson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pomilio v. Crosson, 199 A.D.2d 1052, 608 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with same Memorandum as in Barth v Crosson (199 AD2d 1050 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J.— Summary Judgment.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Green, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Barr ex rel. All Present & Future Judges v. Crosson
175 Misc. 2d 865 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
Barth v. Crosson
199 A.D.2d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
199 A.D.2d 1052, 608 N.Y.S.2d 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pomilio-v-crosson-nyappdiv-1993.