Pomikahl v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Pomikahl v. State

16 S.W.2d 237, 112 Tex. Crim. 271, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 317

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 10, 1929

DocketNo. 12343.

StatusPublished

This text of 16 S.W.2d 237 (Pomikahl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pomikahl v. State, 16 S.W.2d 237, 112 Tex. Crim. 271, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 317 (Tex. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

MARTIN, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted of driving and operating a motor vehicle upon a public road in violation of Art. 1341, P. C., and a fine of $25.00 was assessed against him.

It uncontradictedly appears that appellant drove a car without the consent of the owner from Colorado County into Austin County. He was arrested in Austin County and charged with the above offense, to which charge he plead guilty and was given fifteen days in jail, which judgment he satisfied. The judgment of conviction in Austin County was entered on May 26, 1928. He appears to have been arrested, tried and convicted for the same offense in Colorado County, which judgment of conviction was entered on October 22, 1928. Appellant in the County Court of Colorado County interposed a plea of former conviction in proper form, attaching to his plea certified copies of complaint, information and judgment of conviction in the County Court of Austin County, supporting the same by proof. This was overruled. Appellant was tried and again convicted, from which judgment of conviction he appeals to this Court.

Art. 1341, P. C., under which appellant was prosecuted in both counties is in the nature of a continuous offense. Appellant drove a car from Colorado County to Austin County. It was one transaction and one offense and only one prosecution could be had thereon. The conviction in Austin County was a perpetual bar to any further prosecution and appellant’s plea of former conviction should have been sustained and appellant discharged. Appellant cannot twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense. Art 1, Sec. 14, Constitution of Texas; Ex parte Davis, 89 S. W. 978.

Because of the error discussed the judgment of the trial court is reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARTIN, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted of driving and operating a motor vehicle upon a public road in violation of Art. 1341, P. C., and a fine of $25.00 was assessed against him.

It uncontradictedly appears that appellant drove a car without the consent of the owner from Colorado County into Austin County. He was arrested in Austin County and charged with the above offense, to which charge he plead guilty and was given fifteen days in jail, which judgment he satisfied. The judgment of conviction in Austin County was entered on May 26, 1928. He appears to have been arrested, tried and convicted for the same offense in Colorado County, which judgment of conviction was entered on October 22, 1928. Appellant in the County Court of Colorado County interposed a plea of former conviction in proper form, attaching to his plea certified copies of complaint, information and judgment of conviction in the County Court of Austin County, supporting the same by proof. This was overruled. Appellant was tried and again convicted, from which judgment of conviction he appeals to this Court.

Art. 1341, P. C., under which appellant was prosecuted in both counties is in the nature of a continuous offense. Appellant drove a car from Colorado County to Austin County. It was one transaction and one offense and only one prosecution could be had thereon. The conviction in Austin County was a perpetual bar to any further prosecution and appellant’s plea of former conviction should have been sustained and appellant discharged. Appellant cannot twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense. Art 1, Sec. 14, Constitution of Texas; Ex parte Davis, 89 S. W. 978.

Because of the error discussed the judgment of the trial court is reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 S.W.2d 237, 112 Tex. Crim. 271, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pomikahl-v-state-texcrimapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack