Pomfret v. Atkinson

53 So. 3d 413, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2269, 2011 WL 611823
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2011·No. No. 4D09-1708·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITTEN OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant timely filed a motion for rehearing and request for issuance of a written opinion. We deny the motion for rehearing but grant appellant’s motion for issuance of a written opinion. Accordingly, we withdraw our previous opinion and substitute the following.

Affirmed. See DelMonico v. Traynor, 50 So.3d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ. and TOWBIN SINGER, MICHELE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pomfret v. Atkinson, 53 So. 3d 413, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2269, 2011 WL 611823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

53 So. 3d 413 (Pomfret v. Atkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pomfret v. Atkinson
137 So. 3d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Pomfret v. Atkinson
131 So. 3d 719 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)