Pomfret v. Atkinson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pomfret v. Atkinson

53 So. 3d 413, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2269, 2011 WL 611823

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 2011

DocketNo. 4D09-1708

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 So. 3d 413 (Pomfret v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pomfret v. Atkinson, 53 So. 3d 413, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2269, 2011 WL 611823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF WRITTEN OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant timely filed a motion for rehearing and request for issuance of a written opinion. We deny the motion for rehearing but grant appellant’s motion for issuance of a written opinion. Accordingly, we withdraw our previous opinion and substitute the following.

Affirmed. See DelMonico v. Traynor, 50 So.3d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ. and TOWBIN SINGER, MICHELE, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI