Pomery v. Slacum
This text of 1 D.C. 578 (Pomery v. Slacum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
was of opinion that the indorser in Virginia is liable to the fifteen per cent, damages, although the bill was drawn in Barbadoes, whére the damages are only ten per cent.
The Court also instructed the jury that it is necessary that they should be satisfied that the plaintiff had reasonable notice of the protest for non-payment before the suit brought. It is a necessary part of the plaintiff’s cause of action.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 D.C. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pomery-v-slacum-dcd-1809.