Pomeroy v. Pomeroy

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pomeroy v. Pomeroy

75 So. 3d 428, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19996, 2011 WL 6224499

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 2011

Docket1D11-2315

StatusPublished

This text of 75 So. 3d 428 (Pomeroy v. Pomeroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pomeroy v. Pomeroy, 75 So. 3d 428, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 19996, 2011 WL 6224499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, J.

We find appellant’s argument that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction is without merit. In the General Assignment of Judges No. 2011-02, the chief judge of the Third Judicial Circuit appointed County Court Judge Stephen Murphy “as circuit court judge[ ] to adjudicate any issue pending in any circuit court case in the Third Judicial Circuit that will provide prompt disposition of cases and efficiently administer the courts.”

We reverse the portion of the trial court’s order requiring appellant to provide health, dental, and medical insurance for the parties’ daughter, who was over the age of eighteen. See Kern v. Kern, 360 So.2d 482, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978) (finding “a parent owes no duty of support to an adult child except in extraordinary circumstances as when the child suffers severe physical or mental incapacitation”).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

HAWKES and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI