Pomerantz v. Schlesinger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pomerantz v. Schlesinger

179 A.D. 883

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 179 A.D. 883 (Pomerantz v. Schlesinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pomerantz v. Schlesinger, 179 A.D. 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that the finding of the jury of the defendant’s negligence is against the weight of evidence; and also upon the ground that error was committed in receiving evidence as to repairs upon the machine in question after the accident. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, on the ground that the finding of the jury of the defendant’s negligence is against the weight of evidence; and also upon the ground that error was committed in receiving evidence as to repairs upon the machine in question after the accident. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.D. 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pomerantz-v-schlesinger-nyappdiv-1917.