Pomerance v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DIST.
This text of 783 So. 2d 1056 (Pomerance v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DIST.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David M. POMERANCE, et al., Petitioners,
v.
HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc., Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Karen O. Gaffney, Inverness, FL, for Petitioners.
Jack A. Moring of Myers and Moring, P.A., Crystal River, Florida; and Sidney F. Ansbacher of Upchurch, Bailey & Upchurch, P.A., St. Augustine, FL, for Respondent.
Frank A. Shepherd, Miami, FL, for Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae.
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted review of the decision of the district court of appeal in Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District, 755 So.2d 732 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with the decision in Lake County v. Water Oak Management Corp., 695 So.2d 667 (Fla. 1997). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
783 So. 2d 1056, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 735, 2001 WL 359544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pomerance-v-homosassa-special-water-dist-fla-2001.