Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Pomerance v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DIST.

Pomerance v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DIST.

783 So. 2d 1056, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 735, 2001 WL 359544
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 12, 2001·No. SC00-912·Published

Opinion

783 So.2d 1056 (2001)

David M. POMERANCE, et al., Petitioners,
v.
HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DISTRICT, etc., Respondent.

No. SC00-912.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 12, 2001.

Karen O. Gaffney, Inverness, FL, for Petitioners.

Jack A. Moring of Myers and Moring, P.A., Crystal River, Florida; and Sidney F. Ansbacher of Upchurch, Bailey & Upchurch, P.A., St. Augustine, FL, for Respondent.

Frank A. Shepherd, Miami, FL, for Pacific Legal Foundation, Amicus Curiae.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision of the district court of appeal in Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water District, 755 So.2d 732 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), based on express and direct conflict with the decision in Lake County v. Water Oak Management Corp., 695 So.2d 667 (Fla. 1997). Upon further consideration, we find that review was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pomerance v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DIST., 783 So. 2d 1056, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 240, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 735, 2001 WL 359544 (Fla. 2001).

783 So. 2d 1056 (Pomerance v. HOMOSASSA SPECIAL WATER DIST.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lake County v. Water Oak Management Corp.
695 So. 2d 667 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Pomerance v. Homosassa Special Water Dist.
755 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Las Olas Tower Co. v. City of Fort Lauderdale
783 So. 2d 1056 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)