Polston v. State
18 So. 3d 1140, 2009 WL 2960374
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 17, 2009·No. 1D09-1856·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Danny Ray POLSTON, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
David M. Lamos of the Law Offices of David M. Lamos, Ft. Pierce, for Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(e).
WOLF, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Polston v. State, 18 So. 3d 1140, 2009 WL 2960374 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
18 So. 3d 1140 (Polston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John v. State
18 So. 3d 1140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)