Polstein v. Morse

156 N.Y.S. 569
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 156 N.Y.S. 569 (Polstein v. Morse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Polstein v. Morse, 156 N.Y.S. 569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

PAGE, J.

The testimony of the defendant that he gave notice of the disorderly acts of the other tenants to Mr. Harding raised an important issue of fact for the determination of the jury. The verdict should not have been directed by the court.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.Y.S. 569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polstein-v-morse-nyappterm-1915.