Polson Manufacturing Co. v. Buffalo Kissel Kar Co.
This text of 155 A.D. 940 (Polson Manufacturing Co. v. Buffalo Kissel Kar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order of Special Term and judgment of City Court reversed and a new trial granted in the City Court, with costs to appellant to abide event. Hew trial to be had in the City Court on'the 19th day of March, 1913, at ten A. M. Held, that the issue as to the automobile body not having been decided by the judge of the City Court, and the facts being in dispute, it was error for the Special Term to determine that issue and modify the judgment. The judgment of the City Court should have been reversed and a new trial granted. (See Duclos v. Kelley, 197 N. Y. 76; Farrell v. Farrell, 205 id. 450; Putnam v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co., 191 id. 166.) All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 A.D. 940, 140 N.Y.S. 1140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polson-manufacturing-co-v-buffalo-kissel-kar-co-nyappdiv-1913.