Polson Manufacturing Co. v. Buffalo Kissel Kar Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Polson Manufacturing Co. v. Buffalo Kissel Kar Co.

155 A.D. 940, 140 N.Y.S. 1140

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1913·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order of Special Term and judgment of City Court reversed and a new trial granted in the City Court, with costs to appellant to abide event. Hew trial to be had in the City Court on'the 19th day of March, 1913, at ten A. M. Held, that the issue as to the automobile body not having been decided by the judge of the City Court, and the facts being in dispute, it was error for the Special Term to determine that issue and modify the judgment. The judgment of the City Court should have been reversed and a new trial granted. (See Duclos v. Kelley, 197 N. Y. 76; Farrell v. Farrell, 205 id. 450; Putnam v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co., 191 id. 166.) All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order of Special Term and judgment of City Court reversed and a new trial granted in the City Court, with costs to appellant to abide event. Hew trial to be had in the City Court on'the 19th day of March, 1913, at ten A. M. Held, that the issue as to the automobile body not having been decided by the judge of the City Court, and the facts being in dispute, it was error for the Special Term to determine that issue and modify the judgment. The judgment of the City Court should have been reversed and a new trial granted. (See Duclos v. Kelley, 197 N. Y. 76; Farrell v. Farrell, 205 id. 450; Putnam v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co., 191 id. 166.) All concurred.

Polson Manufacturing Co. v. Buffalo Kissel Kar Co., 155 A.D. 940, 140 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

155 A.D. 940 (Polson Manufacturing Co. v. Buffalo Kissel Kar Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related