Home/Indiana Supreme Court/Polsinelli v. State

Polsinelli v. State

147 N.E. 918, 196 Ind. 569, 1925 Ind. LEXIS 84
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 1925·No. No. 24,693.·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant was charged, substantially in the language of §20, ch. 4, Acts 1917 p. 15, with the offense of maintaining a common nuisance, where intoxicating liquor was sold, etc. A motion to quash the affidavit was overruled, and the only question presented for decision is whether or not the facts stated in the indictment constituted a public offense, the only specific objection thereto suggested by counsel being the alleged insufficiency of the title of said act to embrace the provisions of §20. This question has been decided against appellant’s contention. No error was committed in overruling the motion to quash. Alyea v. State (1925), ante 364, 147 N. E. 144.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Polsinelli v. State, 147 N.E. 918, 196 Ind. 569, 1925 Ind. LEXIS 84 (Ind. 1925).

147 N.E. 918 (Polsinelli v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cannon v. State
335 N.E.2d 229 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1975)
Bays v. State
159 N.E.2d 393 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1959)
Baum v. State
161 A. 244 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1932)
Tyler v. State
177 N.E. 197 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1931)
Edmenster v. State
165 N.E. 769 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1929)
Walker v. State
163 N.E. 229 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1928)
Wrench v. State
152 N.E. 274 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1926)
Cosilito v. State
151 N.E. 721 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1926)
Eisenshank v. State
150 N.E. 365 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1926)
Runck v. State
150 N.E. 311 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1926)
Fronczak v. State
149 N.E. 725 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1925)
Perrone v. State
148 N.E. 412 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1925)