Polsen v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Polsen v. Anderson

32 A.D.2d 780, 302 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3862

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 780 (Polsen v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Polsen v. Anderson, 32 A.D.2d 780, 302 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by a member of the Police Department of the City of Yonkers, pursuant to section 138 of the Second Class Cities Law, as amended 'by Local Laws, 1929, No. 1, of said city, from a determination of the Commissioner of Public Safety of said city and an order thereon, dated June 27, 1968, finding appellant guilty of certain charges, fining him one week’s pay, and directing that an official reprimand be attached to his personal file. Determination and order annulled, on the law, with costs, charges dismissed, fine remitted and reprimand expunged from appellant’s record. In our opinion, the charges against appellant were not established by substantial evidence (cf. Matter of Kelly v. Murphy, 20 N Y 2d 205). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by a member of the Police Department of the City of Yonkers, pursuant to section 138 of the Second Class Cities Law, as amended 'by Local Laws, 1929, No. 1, of said city, from a determination of the Commissioner of Public Safety of said city and an order thereon, dated June 27, 1968, finding appellant guilty of certain charges, fining him one week’s pay, and directing that an official reprimand be attached to his personal file. Determination and order annulled, on the law, with costs, charges dismissed, fine remitted and reprimand expunged from appellant’s record. In our opinion, the charges against appellant were not established by substantial evidence (cf. Matter of Kelly v. Murphy, 20 N Y 2d 205). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 780, 302 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/polsen-v-anderson-nyappdiv-1969.